

A leading environmental solution provider
Get in touch with usThe U.S. renewable energy sector is currently navigating a period of significant policy recalibration. While federal actions, particularly the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA) and recent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposals, signal a strategic shift towards domestic energy dominance and a re-evaluation of clean energy incentives, they also introduce considerable uncertainty. In this evolving landscape, state-level policies are emerging as increasingly vital drivers, creating a dynamic patchwork of opportunities and challenges for Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs), and Renewable Natural Gas (RNGs). For businesses operating in these markets, understanding this bifurcated policy environment is paramount for strategic planning and sustained growth.
Recent federal actions underscore a clear intent to reshape the U.S. energy transition, with a pronounced "American First" philosophy.
The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA), signed into law on July 4, 2025, has significantly altered the federal incentive structure for clean energy. It accelerates the phase-out of key federal tax credits, such as the Section 45Y Production Tax Credit (PTC) and Section 48E Clean Electricity Investment Tax Credit (ITC), particularly for wind and solar projects. New wind and solar facilities generally must commence construction by July 4, 2026, or be placed in service by December 31, 2027, to qualify for these credits, a considerably shorter window than previously available.
This accelerated phase-out is projected to lead to significant delays or cancellations of clean energy projects, with analyses estimating a reduction of nearly 70 gigawatts in solar and wind capacity additions by 2030. Such a reduction directly impacts the future supply of RECs, potentially leading to supply constraints and increased price volatility in the compliance market. The increased cost of developing these projects, stemming from the loss of tax credits, is also expected to translate into higher electricity costs for consumers and impact Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) pricing.
Concurrently, the EPA's proposed "Set 2" Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) rule for 2026-2027, announced on June 13, 2025, introduces equally significant changes for RINs. While proposing the highest ever overall renewable fuel volumes, the rule includes a transformative 50% reduction in RIN value for imported biofuels and foreign-sourced feedstocks. This policy is explicitly designed to bolster national energy independence, strengthen domestic agricultural markets, and re-shore biofuel supply chains, aligning with the "American First" energy philosophy. The proposed elimination of eRINs (renewable electricity RINs) further underscores this shift.
These changes will significantly impact the competitiveness of U.S.-produced biofuels and feedstocks, likely supporting prices for agricultural commodities like corn and soybeans. However, they also introduce new complexities for market participants accustomed to a more globalized supply chain.
In light of these federal shifts, state-level policies are becoming increasingly critical for several reasons:
Across the U.S., states are implementing diverse policies that continue to drive the renewable energy commodities markets:
State-level Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) remain a primary driver for compliance RECs. These mandates require utilities to source a specific percentage of their electricity from renewable generators by a designated year, ensuring a steady demand for RECs regardless of federal policy changes. States like Texas, with its comprehensive REC system, and regions like the Western United States (WREGIS), continue to track and facilitate REC trading, providing the necessary infrastructure for these markets to function. Even as federal incentives for new wind and solar projects face headwinds, existing state RPS and Clean Energy Standards (CES) will continue to underpin a significant portion of REC demand in North America.
While the federal RFS program is the dominant force for RINs, state-level initiatives also play a role in promoting biofuel use. Programs like California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) and Oregon's LCFS create additional financial incentives for renewable fuels, including those that generate RINs, particularly for use in the transportation sector. These state-specific carbon reduction programs complement federal mandates by valuing the carbon intensity of fuels, thereby encouraging the production and use of lower-carbon biofuels.
The RNG market, in particular, is seeing significant momentum driven by state-level policies:
These state-level initiatives provide localized support and pathways for growth, often filling gaps left by federal policy shifts and ensuring continued investment in RNG infrastructure and supply.
For AFS Commodities and its clients, navigating this complex, multi-layered policy environment requires a sophisticated and adaptive strategy:
The U.S. renewable energy landscape is undergoing a significant transformation, marked by a federal policy pullback in certain areas and a simultaneous surge in state-level leadership. This creates a complex, yet opportunity-rich, environment for RECs, RINs, and RNGs. While federal actions are reshaping national supply chains and incentive structures, state policies are increasingly vital in driving localized development, ensuring compliance, and fostering innovation. For AFS Commodities and its clients, success in this new era hinges on a deep understanding of these shifting dynamics, proactive strategic adjustments, and the ability to leverage expert market intelligence to navigate the evolving patchwork of policies and secure a resilient, sustainable energy future.